Jacques Mallah wrote:
>
> Well, isn't your SSSA-R useless without that?
> So how do you come down in the quantum immortality debate? If your
> SSSAR is really the same as the RSSA as Russell Standish seemed to say in
> his posts to me, that's certainly a counterintuitive consequence of it.
I don't think I've ever said that. The connections between all the
*SSA*s are far from clear. Also, QTI is _not_ a consequence of the
RSSA, merely allowed. Is Nick even aware of your counter argument to
the QTI? From my perspective, I seem to be only person taking you
argument seriously enough to criticise it!
Cheers
>
> Russell, I know I said my next post would be on your paper, but I've had
> other things to do lately. I'm working on it.
>
> - - - - - - -
> Jacques Mallah (jackmallah.domain.name.hidden)
> Physicist / Many Worlder / Devil's Advocate
> "I know what no one else knows" - 'Runaway Train', Soul Asylum
> My URL: http://hammer.prohosting.com/~mathmind/
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Russell Standish Director
High Performance Computing Support Unit, Phone 9385 6967
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 Fax 9385 6965
Australia R.Standish.domain.name.hidden
Room 2075, Red Centre
http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wed Jul 26 2000 - 17:55:40 PDT