Re: Natural selection (spinoff from "History-less observer moments")

From: Jacques Mallah <jackmallah.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 15:27:25 -0700 (PDT)

--- GSLevy.domain.name.hidden wrote:
> R.Standish.domain.name.hidden writes:
> > http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks/pubs.html

> >need to apply the self sampling assumption, namely
> >that we expect to find ourselves in an anthropic
> >principle consistent history that is nearly
> >maximal in its measure.

    I was surprised to see this because here RS uses
the SSA in a way that cuts across different "people",
i.e. he uses the ASSA. If he believes the ASSA then
by self consistency he should not believe the
RSSA/QTI.

> wabbits (I like this term coined by Jacques).

    Thanks George, and that's the first logical thing
you've said in a long time.

=====
- - - - - - -
               Jacques Mallah (jackmallah.domain.name.hidden)
         Physicist / Many Worlder / Devil's Advocate
"I know what no one else knows" - 'Runaway Train', Soul Asylum
         My URL: http://hammer.prohosting.com/~mathmind/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
Received on Sun May 21 2000 - 15:28:32 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:07 PST