--- Russell Standish <R.Standish.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> There needs to be psychological time in which to
> unravel the history embedded in a single observer
> moment. Once one has psychological time, one may as
> well go the whole hog and have a complete history,
> with an infinite number of observer moments.
>
> Its an Occam thing. Nothing rules out a "Groundhog
> Day" type of effect, where we endlessly keep playing
> back a small piece of history (eg 1 day, or even 10
> seconds if you like), however I suspect this is
> a more complicated explanation (therefore of smaller
> measure) than just assuming that we live our whole
> lives.
You were doing fine until that little word "we".
Other obsever-moments exist, but there's no reason to
insist that the ones that seem psychologically to be
in our past or future are really "the same person".
=====
- - - - - - -
Jacques Mallah (jackmallah.domain.name.hidden)
Physicist / Many Worlder / Devil's Advocate
"I know what no one else knows" - 'Runaway Train', Soul Asylum
My URL:
http://hammer.prohosting.com/~mathmind/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
Received on Wed May 03 2000 - 16:53:10 PDT