-- Russell Standish <R.Standish.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> A lot of things have measure, not just observer
> moments. For example, all strings in the Schmidhuber
> plenitude have a measure given by the
> Universal Prior. Not all strings are observer
> moments.
You're playing with words. The point is a measure
distribution must be measure *of something*. Thus it
makes no sense to speak of "the measure distribution"
given a wavefunction, unless you state what it is
measure *of*. The only measure distribution we have
been dealing with in that context is of
observer-moments. I call that M(c) where c is a label
for an observer-moment, which I take to be a
computation step.
=====
- - - - - - -
Jacques Mallah (jackmallah.domain.name.hidden)
Physicist / Many Worlder / Devil's Advocate
"I know what no one else knows" - 'Runaway Train', Soul Asylum
My URL:
http://hammer.prohosting.com/~mathmind/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online and get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
Received on Thu Apr 27 2000 - 12:07:38 PDT