On Sep 17, 11:17 pm, Flammarion <peterdjo....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> > Has it? I thought we were discussing whether CTM made any meaningful
> > commitments as a physical theory, not whether physics can or can't
> > include consciousness per se. Now you raise the question, I don't
> > believe it can, simply because in common with virtually every other
> > human attempt to characterise the world, its perspective is embedded
> > in consciousness and hence can't envision it.
>
> Unless consciousnes is just the very thing that envision itself.
Just so. But what is opaque is its relation to physics.
David
> On 17 Sep, 00:02, David Nyman <david.ny....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
> > Has it? I thought we were discussing whether CTM made any meaningful
> > commitments as a physical theory, not whether physics can or can't
> > include consciousness per se. Now you raise the question, I don't
> > believe it can, simply because in common with virtually every other
> > human attempt to characterise the world, its perspective is embedded
> > in consciousness and hence can't envision it.
>
> Unless consciousnes is just the very thing that envision itself.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Sep 17 2009 - 16:31:53 PDT