Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology

From: m.a. <marty684.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:31:22 -0400

Bruno,
           Could you please clarify to a non-mathematician why the principle of excluded middle is so central to your thesis (hopefully without using acronyms like AUDA, UD etc.). Many modern schools of philosophy reject the idea. Thanks,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            m.a.


  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Bruno Marchal
  To: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
  Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 4:02 AM
  Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology




  Given that I am using "Platonic" in the sense of the theologian, and not in the larger sense of the mathematician, it would be nice to cooperate a little bit on the vocabulary so as not confusing the mind of the reader.
  I am commited to the use of the excluded middle in arithmetic, that's all.

  Once you accept the excluded middle

    principle, like most mathematicians, you discover there is a

    "universe" full of living things there, developing complex views.




  Bruno


  http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/






  

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Sep 13 2009 - 10:31:22 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:16 PST