On 2 Sep, 16:58, David Nyman <david.ny....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> 2009/9/2 Flammarion <peterdjo....domain.name.hidden>:
>
> >> Well, as well as the question of what constitutes the qualitative
> >> character of such snapshots, one might also wonder about the curious
> >> fact that such 'frozen' capsules nonetheless appear to us as
> >> possessing internal temporal duration and differentiation.
>
> > Easily explained if perceptual data are "timestamped".
>
> Yes, that would appear to be the specification, more or less. What's
> the implementation?
Is that a philosophical question?
>
>
>
> > On 01 Sep, 23:48, David Nyman <david.ny....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> >> On 1 Sep, 17:46, Flammarion <peterdjo....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
> >> > time capsules are just what I am talking about. Why would you need
> >> > anythign more for the specious present than a "snapshop" some of
> >> > which is out of date?
>
> >> Well, as well as the question of what constitutes the qualitative
> >> character of such snapshots, one might also wonder about the curious
> >> fact that such 'frozen' capsules nonetheless appear to us as
> >> possessing internal temporal duration and differentiation.
>
> > Easily explained if perceptual data are "timestamped".
>
> >>This seems
> >> to appeal simultaneously to aspects of both flux and block models of
> >> time whilst being entirely consistent with neither.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Sep 02 2009 - 09:18:17 PDT