On 1 Sep, 14:40, David Nyman <david.ny....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> On 1 Sep, 12:04, Flammarion <peterdjo....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
> > Yeah. Or you could just answer my questions.
>
> The problem is the world of assumption contained in your use of
> "just".
Really?
>There is no possibility of a context-free 'objective'
> exchange of views. There must be some sympathetic matching of
> contexts of understanding, even if only for the honourable purpose of
> comprehending a viewpoint as intended in order to discount it with a
> clear conscience.
it is standard practice for lecturers to ask for quesitons when they
have
finished. They do that because it works -- it clears up
misudnerstandings.
Assuming that miscommunication has to be the audiences fault doesn;t
work.
I have never seen that in a professional settign but it is quite
common on
usenet.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Sep 01 2009 - 07:35:52 PDT