> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:13:54 -0700
> From: meekerdb.domain.name.hidden
> To: everything-list.domain.name.hidden
> Subject: Re: Emulation and Stuff
>
>
> Flammarion wrote:
> ...
> > We might call these three notions of existence Q-existence, M-
> > existence and C-existence for short. My argument with you has been
> > that even if one wishes to postulate a single universe, M-existence is
> > an unnecessary middleman and doesn't even seem well-defined, all we
> > need to do is postulate that out of all the mathematically possible
> > universes that have Q-existence, only one has C-existence.
> >
> > The M-existence hypothesis is supported by the whole of science, and,
> > unlike the C-existence hypothesis, is in line
> > with the scientific claim that there was a long period when there was
> > no consciousness in the universe.
> >
> I'm confused by these last two paragraphs. Did Peter write both of
> them? The first seems to be against M-existence and the second for
> M-existence...or maybe I misunderstand?
>
The first of those paragraphs was from me.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Aug 21 2009 - 03:18:32 PDT