>From: Higgo James <james.higgo.domain.name.hidden>
>To: 'Fritz Griffith'
><fritzgriffith.domain.name.hidden>,"'everything-list.domain.name.hidden.com'"
><everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
>Subject: Idea is better than observer moment
>Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 09:43:56 -0000
>
>Why should an observer-moment be a Planck time? Why should it be related to
>time? I prefer to use the word, 'idea' to observer-moment. Ideas do not
>imply time, wheras moment does. A single brain can have several ideas
>rattling around inside it.
>James
>
Well yes, you're right, an observer moment is not related to time, so I'm
not sure it is correct to consider it a moment in plancke time or not. But
the term 'idea' is just too vague for me. Other than the terms we coin for
our theories, I'm having a hard time figuring out if your ideas are the same
as mine.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at
http://www.hotmail.com
Received on Wed Jan 26 2000 - 17:10:46 PST