...You're making me think, Bruno. :-)
4) Key questions for the sequel, on which you can meditate: - is there a bijection between N and NxN? (NxN = the cartesian product of N with N) - is there a bijection between N and N^N?
Since there are two elements in the domain {0,1}, if we write down all pairs of numbers (n,m) and map 00 to the first and 01 to the second we will have constructed all functions from 2 to N. But above we've already enumerated all pairs of numbers, NxN. So we just map 0 to the number in first one and 1 to the second and we have an enumerated list of the functions from 2 to N.New exercises for the adventurous: In the context of sets, 2 will represent the set {0, 1}. OK? And 03 will represent {0, 1, 2}, etc. Find a bijection between NxN and N^2 this means find a bijection between NXN and the set of functions from 2(= {0,1}) to N.
First note that we can use the mapping NxN -> N to reduce NxNx...xN (m times) to NxNx...xN (m-1 times) by substituting for a pair in NxN the number from N determined by the above bijection. So we can construct a bijection NxNx...xN <-> N.Define NxNxN by Nx(NxN), with (x,y,z) represented (bijectively) by (x, (y,z)) OK? Find a bijection between NxNxN and N^3 Show that there is a bijection between NxNxNxNxNx ... xN (m times) and N^m, in the sense of above. That is NxNxNxNxNx ... xN is defined by Nx(Nx(Nx ... ))))), and N^m is the set of functions from m to N, and m = {0, 1, ... m-1}.
Hmmm? I could say I've already proven it above or that it follows from the above by induction, but the scheme would require writing down infinitely many infinite lists so I'm not sure the above proof generalizes to N^N.For the very adventurous: Find a bijection between NxNxNx .... and N^N?
Despite perhaps the appearances, all those new exercises are rather easy. The above in "4)" key questions are more difficult. Oh! I forget to ask you the simplest exercise : Find a bijection between N and N^1, with 1 = {0}. N^1 is of course the set of functions from 1 to N, i.e. from {0} to N. Don't worry, if this last exercise didn't give the clue (for the new exercises), I will explain why this new exercises are really simple, and why it is simpler than the key questions. OK, this is food for friday and the week-end, Ask any questions, or do any remarks. We approach surely to the first big theorem (Cantor). Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:16 PST