...You're making me think, Bruno. :-)
4) Key questions for the sequel, on which you can meditate: - is there a bijection between N and NxN? (NxN = the cartesian product of N with N) - is there a bijection between N and N^N?
New exercises for the adventurous:
In the context of sets, 2 will represent the set {0, 1}. OK? And 03
will represent {0, 1, 2}, etc.
Find a bijection between NxN and N^2
this means find a bijection between NXN and the set of functions
from 2(= {0,1}) to N.
Since there are two elements in the domain {0,1}, if we write down all
pairs of numbers (n,m) and map 00 to the first and 01 to the second we
will have constructed all functions from 2 to N. But above we've
already enumerated all pairs of numbers, NxN. So we just map 0 to the
number in first one and 1 to the second and we have an enumerated list
of the functions from 2 to N.
Define NxNxN by Nx(NxN), with (x,y,z) represented (bijectively) by (x,
(y,z)) OK?
Find a bijection between NxNxN and N^3
Show that there is a bijection between NxNxNxNxNx ... xN (m times) and
N^m, in the sense of above. That is
NxNxNxNxNx ... xN is defined by Nx(Nx(Nx ... ))))), and N^m is the set
of functions from m to N, and m = {0, 1, ... m-1}.
First note that we can use the mapping NxN -> N to reduce NxNx...xN
(m times) to NxNx...xN (m-1 times) by substituting for a pair in NxN
the number from N determined by the above bijection. So we can
construct a bijection NxNx...xN <-> N.Hmmm? I could say I've already proven it above or that it follows from the above by induction, but the scheme would require writing down infinitely many infinite lists so I'm not sure the above proof generalizes to N^N.For the very adventurous: Find a bijection between NxNxNx .... and N^N?
Despite perhaps the appearances, all those new exercises are rather
easy. The above in "4)" key questions are more difficult.
Oh! I forget to ask you the simplest exercise :
Find a bijection between N and N^1, with 1 = {0}.
N^1 is of course the set of functions from 1 to N, i.e. from {0} to N.
Don't worry, if this last exercise didn't give the clue (for the new
exercises), I will explain why this new exercises are really simple,
and why it is simpler than the key questions.
OK, this is food for friday and the week-end,
Ask any questions, or do any remarks. We approach surely to the first
big theorem (Cantor).
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:16 PST