Re: Dreaming On

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:57:50 +0200

On 31 Jul 2009, at 12:43, 1Z wrote:

>
>
>
> On 31 July, 10:03, Bruno Marchal <marc....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>> On 31 Jul 2009, at 10:32, 1Z wrote (to David):
>>
>>> But you haven't said what the problem is in the emergence of the
>>> mental
>>> from the physical
>>
>> It is usually called the mind-body problem. There are many good book
>> on the subject.
>
> There are many bad solutions too. Finding a good solution
> means having an exat grasp of the problem, not saying in some
> vague way that mind and matter are different things.

I don't see to what you make allusion.


>
>
>> My own work is partially a reformulation of that problem (and
>> partially a beginning of a solution), when taking Mechanism seriously
>> into account.
>>
>> Tell us which step in UDA you have a problem of understanding with.
>> Give us a number between 01 and 8, and a justification. OK?
>
> I don't have a problem in understanding anything. I have a problem
> in granting Platonism. Without Platonism, there is no UDA "just
> there".

I guess you mean that there is no universal dovetailer (UD) out there.
Who ever said that? I just say that the UD exists in the sense that
you can prove its existence in a tiny weak part of Arithmetic.


>
> wihout a UDA there are no generated minds, without generated minds
> there is no illusory matter.

Sure. But the UD exists, like prime number exists.


> At best you have an alternative to
> materalism-realism,
> not a disproof of it.


Well, then there should be a number between 1 and 8, or 00 and 08 where
you miss the step.
Apparently it is the 0 step, given that you still don't understand
that my hypothesis is just classical digital mechanism. Classical
means I accept the excluded third principle.

I think the confusion comes from the fact that I obtain platonist (in
Plato or Plotinus sense) conclusions. But the hypotheses are 100%
neutral or agnostic on this point. Like in Paris and Brussels you
still confuse the conclusion (admittedly startling) and the hypothesis.

Show me a piece of text I have written, anywhere, which makes you
think so please,

Bruno


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Jul 31 2009 - 15:57:50 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:16 PST