RE: Everything is Just a Memory

From: Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 21 09:46:41 2000

>Well if you can accept that obsever moments exist without an observer, then
>we are on track

Sure we are on track. Remember that our initial trifle here
is related to the measure question.

I can accept observer moment without observer (certainly without
what is taken as physical observer). So the question of "the person"
is less demanding (I even guess we disagree there only on
terminology questions).

The real problem I have is your insistence that the observer
moments are totally unrelated, or that there is no measure-like problems.

You are telling us that the SSA
is useless, and you are dropping most of the "theories" proposed here,
without even a suggestion for alternatives.

We are on track about the ontology.
But, are we on track on the epistemology ?

It is nice to understand the laws of physics come from WAP and/or COMP.
The problem now is to derive the laws of physics from WAP and/or COMP.

And as I said, without measure-like concept, without structure on the
set of observer-moments, I don't see any ways to derive physics.
Comp entails some natural measure on the set of observer-moments, why
not use them?

Bruno
Received on Fri Jan 21 2000 - 09:46:41 PST