Le 12-juin-09, à 09:31, Bruno Marchal a écrit :
>
> On 11 Jun 2009, at 21:43, Jesse Mazer wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Ah, that makes sense--I hadn't thought of combining multiple
>> universal quantifiers in that way, but obviously you can do so and
>> get a meaningful statement about arithmetic that for a mathematical
>> realist should be either true or false.
>
>
> Even for just an arithmetical realist. (All mathematicians are
> arithmetical realist, much less are mathematical realist. I am not an
> arithmetical realist).
Raaah... Sorry. Of course I am an arithmetical realist. I am not a
*mathematical* realist (still less a physical realist).
With the month of June I have a lot of works to do, and I tend to do it
simultaneously. The result is an augmentation of mistakes! I hope you
have learned to automatically correct them. Sorry. Please, ask in case
of remaining doubt.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Jun 12 2009 - 12:27:27 PDT