Re: Cognitive Theoretic Model of the Universe

From: ronaldheld <RonaldHeld.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 05:23:46 -0700 (PDT)

Bruno:
 I understand a little better. is there a citition for a version of
Church Thesis that all algorithm can be written in
FORTRAN?
                         Ronald


On Jun 4, 10:49 am, Bruno Marchal <marc....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> Hi Ronald,
>
> On 02 Jun 2009, at 16:45, ronaldheld wrote:
>
>
>
> > Bruno:
> >   Since I program in Fortran, I am uncertain how to interpret things.
>
> I was alluding to old, and less old, disputes again programmers, about  
> which programming language to prefer.
> It is a version of Church Thesis that all algorithm can be written in  
> FORTRAN. But this does not mean that it is relevant to define an  
> algorithm by a fortran program. I thought this was obvious, and I was  
> using that "known" confusion to point on a similar confusion in Set  
> Theory, like Langan can be said to perform.
>
> In Set Theorist, we still find often the error consisting in defining  
> a mathematical object by a set. I have done that error in my youth.
> What you can do, indeed, is to *represent* (almost all) mathematical  
> objects by sets. Langan seems to make that mistake.
>
> The point is just that we have to distinguish a mathematical object  
> and the representation of that object in some mathematical theory.
>
> I will have the opportunity to give a precise example in the 7th  
> thread later.
>
> In usual mathematical practice, this mistake is really not important,  
> yet, in logic it is more important to take into account that  
> distinction, and then in cognitive science it is *very* important.  
> Crucial, I would say. The error consisting in identifying  
> consciousness and brain state belongs to that family, for example. To  
> confuse a person and its body belongs to that family of error too.
>
> All such error are of the form of the confusion between the Moon and  
> the finger which point to the moon, or the confusion between a map and  
> the territory.
>
> I have nothing against the use of FORTRAN. On the contrary I have a  
> big respect for that old venerable high level programming language :)
>
> Bruno
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Jun 05 2009 - 05:23:46 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:16 PST