Russell:
Maybe you might be interested in gfortran(
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/
GFortran)?
Ronald
On Jun 2, 6:38 pm, russell standish <li....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 07:45:22AM -0700, ronaldheld wrote:
>
> > Bruno:
> > Since I program in Fortran, I am uncertain how to interpret things.
> > Ronald
>
> Maybe if he said Fortran IV or Fortran 66, it might have made the
> point clearer. I know guys who still program in Fortran 66. The rest
> of us have moved on ... Fortran 95 is not a bad language to program in
> for instance - and 2003 has some interesting features, although I don't
> know of any freely available compilers.
>
> Personally, I went C++ in the early 90s because g++ was available and
> the equivalent for Fortran 90 was not (gfortran or g95 arrived by
> about 2000 IIRC).
>
> --
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
> Mathematics
> UNSW SYDNEY 2052 hpco....domain.name.hidden
> Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Jun 04 2009 - 04:17:19 PDT