Re: [Fwd: NDPR David Shoemaker, Personal Identity and Ethics: A Brief Introduction]

From: Günther Greindl <guenther.greindl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:09:04 +0100

Hi Bruno,

>> With COMP it is not so clear.
>
> explicit appeal to self-consistency (= the move from Bp to Bp & Dt; the
> "Dt" suppresses the cul-de-sac). With comp, to believe in a next
> instant or in a successor state is already based on an act of faith.

Please bear in mind that I have not yet studied the AUDA in detail. How
does Dt suppress cul-de-sac?


Cheers,
Günther

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Mar 06 2009 - 12:08:37 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST