The file..... sorry .... use *Rejection 101.pdf*
enjoy!
colin
Colin Hales wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
> I feel your angst. The received view is a blunt and frightened beast,
> guarded by the ignorant and uncreative in wily protection of turf and
> co-conspirator. I recently did a powerpoint presentation called
> "rejection 101". It sounds like you have been through exactly what I
> have been through - except on a geological timescale that would tire a
> god. Although I am starting to make progress... I regard that progress
> to be achieved in spite of them, not because of their vision or
> knowledge. The science I thought I was going to find was full of those
> who frolic in ideas.... sadly I was mistaken. Now, when I think I have
> made progress - I know that progress to be mediated by the less than
> adequate - and promulgated by momentum rather than incisive scrutiny-
> and it doesn't feel good.
>
> see file *2008_Thu_23_Oct.pdf * in the googlegroups everythinglist
> file store.
>
> So Amoebas speak english now, eh? Excellent. :-)
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
>
> m.a. wrote:
>> *Bruno,*
>> * I've often wondered why neither Dr. Deutsch nor Alan
>> Forrester has commented on your theory of UDA and AUDA. I certainly
>> would be interested in their views. A theory that has execised some
>> of the best minds on this list for months on end certainly deserves
>> serious consideration. Best,*
>>
>>
>> *martin a.*
>> **
>> **
>> **
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bruno Marchal" <marchal.domain.name.hidden <mailto:marchal.domain.name.hidden>>
>> To: <everything-list.domain.name.hidden
>> <mailto:everything-list.domain.name.hidden>>
>> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 2:49 PM
>> Subject: Re: The Amoeba's Secret - English Version started
>>
>>
>> > Even with politics operating behind the scene (which you have
>> > hinted), I can't imagine that nothing of the work is publishable.
>>
>>
>> I already discussed proposition of publishing "Conscience et
>> Mécanisme" with three publishers, before my thesis was judged not
>> receivable (meaning no private defense, nor public defense, I have
>> *never* met those who criticize, not even my work, but a product of
>> their imagination). Then silence, even after the defense in Lille, and
>> even more after the paradoxical price in Paris.
>>
>> I cannot explain. Or I can explain except that here reality is far
>> beyond fiction as usual, but also more sad, and rather delicate if
>> only because that story is not finished.
>> My life is more unbelievable than any thing I assert in my works. It
>> took me 22 years to understand what happened in 1977, and since then.
>>
>> I feel responsible to let them build they own trap, and then get
>> myself a bit worried seeing them to protect themselves from Brussels
>> to Paris!
>>
>> It is not because I have done an "original work" (say) in Brussels,
>> that I got problems there. It is because I got problems in Brussels
>> that I have done an original work. In 1977, they give me no chance,
>> not even getting out of Belgium.
>> In 1994, my work was criticize vaguely as "not original", "too much
>> simple", and then "delirious". And now already "not from him" in some
>> place. Which again shows the problems is not related with my findings,
>> except it belongs to the kind of things you can easily use to treat
>> you as a fool (Gödel's theorem, Quantum mechanics, consciousness: few
>> understand so it is easy to say "not serious").
>>
>> The little scandal has grown up all the time and is too big, now. It
>> is the kind of manipulation which makes everyone feel responsible,
>> from corporatist reflex to corporatist reflex, when actually there is
>> only one, very clever, but very bad, guy.
>> Now that "little scandal" has become big enough to throw light on
>> other really bigger scandals. There are "cadavres dans les placards",
>> as we say in French (corpses hidden in boxes). Mean of pressures.
>>
>> I still believe in academies, but like in School "serial killer" can
>> exist. When you see the time made by religious institution to protect
>> their member of their hierarchy from their much grave behavior, I
>> estimate it could take a long time if ever to understand and recognize
>> what happened.
>> And I have no problem with serious academicians and scientists which
>> understand enough to understand it is "serious", even if probably
>> wrong, which I have myself never ceased to believe plausible (which
>> explains why I am eager to discuss the validity of the UDA steps, with
>> people interested). I did defend the work as PhD thesis. I was asked
>> many questions, I answered them and everyone got the idea. Some people
>> takes time, but most get enough to trust the interest of the work.
>> Still today, few get both UDA and AUDA.
>>
>> UDA is almost easy, but not so easy. AUDA is very *simple*, once you
>> understand enough standard logic (which I have discovered is
>> excessively rare). The whole thing is strongly interdisciplinary, and
>> between disciplines, rumors circulate more quickly than "scientific
>> bridge", which often makes people feeling being aggressed on their
>> territories. Even more so when the work approaches question
>> traditionally qualified as "philosophical".
>>
>> My initial power comes from the fact that in 1977, I did abandoned,
>> for bad reasons (but it will take many years to understand that), the
>> idea of doing academic research, and so I did come back to the very
>> fundamental questioning I have always been living. I didn't and don't
>> complain (my weakness probably).
>> And it is the Academy, 20 years later, which will push me back again,
>> and again. I have never submitted publications by myself. All have
>> been asked by people, having heard I said something new, sometimes
>> insisting gently. Nowadays, since those events, even ordered paper (or
>> jobs) get jeopardized quickly. Last year I was asked to write a paper
>> for a book in homage to the late logician Jean Ladričre, (who offered
>> to me its formidable book on Gödel theorems: Les limitations internes
>> des formalismes"), and then ... nothing again. I am used to it.
>>
>> Thanks for your interest,
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ <http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/%7Emarchal/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Mar 05 2009 - 23:45:02 PST