Hi,
you shouldn't equate QS with QI... QI says there always exists a next moment
(hence you always stays 'conscious'). QS says that you'll always survive in
one piece after putting you in front of a destruction machine and activating
it... well yes by QI you'll have a next moment... but the result with you
with a big disabilities has a much more higher relative measure than you
staying in one piece. So in this respect QS is false... So doing QS will
only greatens your own infinite hell... hell is bad but there always exists
a worst place.
Quentin
2009/2/14 Jack Mallah <jackmallah.domain.name.hidden>
>
> Hi Johnathan. I see that there are some new people like yourself here. I
> like to see new people and younger people take an interest in the
> philosophical issues, though at the same time it saddens me to see so many
> continue to fall victim to the the QS fallacy.
>
> I have made an important discovery: the "save as draft" feature of email.
> Rather than shoot off quick piecemeal replies to the various threads on the
> topic, I will be posting a consolidated reply and several thought
> experiments, which I hope will explain everything. (No, not yet the
> Platonic Everything.)
>
> Jack
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
--
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Feb 14 2009 - 13:13:25 PST