--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Quentin Anciaux <allcolor.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> From a 1st perspective commonness is useless in the argument. The important is what it feels like for the experimenter.
You seem to be saying that commonness of an experience has no effect on, what for practical purposes, is whether people should expect to experience it. That is a contradiction in terms. It is false by definition. If an "uncommon" experience gets experienced just as often as a "common" experience, then by definition they are equally common and have equal measure.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Feb 11 2009 - 17:00:14 PST