Re: briefly wading back into the fray

From: Günther Greindl <guenther.greindl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:23:52 +0100

Hello Jack,

> I could tell you what's wrong with his MGA, but I'm here to deal with the QS paper first.

I appreciate your prioritizing your paper, but I would be interested in
what you find wrong with the MGA.

By the way, as I mentioned in a previous mail to John, my departure from
materialism started with this book:

http://www.amazon.com/Every-Thing-Must-Metaphysics-Naturalized/dp/0199276196/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1234106347&sr=8-1

I also read your paper, and I my main problem is that you have strong
physicalist (materialist) assumptions - that there is some matter in the
universe which "instantiates" brain states.

That is indeed a problematic view - so maybe you could relate your take
on the MGA?

Cheers,
Günther

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Feb 08 2009 - 10:23:12 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST