Hi, Stephen (after along time!),
it is about THE "after Big Bang" inflation .
I am a 'noninflationary' guy: IMO inflation was deemed necessary to cope
with the mathematical problems connected the Big Bang idea and applying the
present (here and now) system's math to it - at a system ENTIRELY different
from conditions we experience as the basis of such math.
In my 'narrative' ( don't call it theory) about "a" big bang origin (which I
accept in spite of my scond thoughts of the validity of the expansion) -
I assign the starting conditions and the applicability of early-universe
math
to the transition "no-space to space" from the a-spatial proto-Big Bang into
our space-time system. The transition from nonexisting (=zero) space into
"space" is indeed an (infinite?) inflationary change.
*
Same thing with 'time', wich would explain the marvels of the (infinitesimal
small fractions of the "FIRST" second): the transition of "NO TIME" into a
'time-system' - expressed in terms of physical quantization applied to the
Big Bang conditions.
I don't want to start an argument on this, I am not ready - it is a
narrative.
Have a good 2009
John Mikes
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Stephen Paul King
<stephenk1.domain.name.hidden>wrote:
>
> Hi Ronald,
>
> Some people, myself included, would be a lot more comfortable with the
> whole inflation idea if a) there where some experimental evidence of the
> scalar fields that are required and b) some sound explanation where given
> as
> to how an in principle unknowable phenomenon - the BB singularity itself -
> is any different from a Creative Deity, sans only the anthropomorphisms.
> R. Penrose, in his book Road to Reality, brought up a very clear case
> that inflation does not solve the horizon problem when we consider causaly
> disjoint regions; has any one countered his arguement?
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Stephen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "ronaldheld" <RonaldHeld.domain.name.hidden>
> To: "Everything List" <everything-list.domain.name.hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 7:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
>
>
>
> I do not see the Inflation paradigm as ad-hoc, for it explains the
> flatness, Horizon problem and lack of early universe relics better
> than any other to date. Now the Big Bang may be replaced by
> oscillating solutions from LQG or other theories, but AFAIK they still
> need an Inflation period.
> Ronald
>
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Jan 21 2009 - 11:35:47 PST