Re: Consciousness and free will

From: John Mikes <jamikes.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 15:49:15 -0500

Ronald, Bruno, and others:

I am the 'old naive commonsesicle guy' who considers 'everything' as
'everything'. Not curtailed into mathematical, physical, or other human
invented topical restrictions, not even into the "possible" as WE think
about it today.
I go with Hal Ruhl in washing away the limit to nothing, since we (humanly
restricted minds) cannot fathom what we cannot fathom, but it may
be included into REAL(?) everything.
Maybe the list-name is thought as less than that?

John M

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:14 AM, ronaldheld <RonaldHeld.domain.name.hidden> wrote:

>
> Bruno:
> We may be talking different thing but the TOE for Physics does not
> exist yet. I would think it would be QM and General Relativity and
> other things we do not know.
> Could this program be running an evolving mathematical structure
> or maybe you prefer evolving block universe/multiverse?
> Ronald
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Dec 04 2008 - 15:49:23 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST