Re: MGA 2

From: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:45:48 -0800

Telmo Menezes wrote:
> Quentin,
>
> Ok, but what if consciousness is a computational process that
> potentially depends on the entire state of the universe? Let's suppose
> for example that quantum particles are the fundamental building
> blocks, i.e. the hardware, and that consciousness is a computational
> process that emerges from their interactions. We still have MEC+MAT,
> and due to quantum entanglement, any quantum particle in the universe
> can potentially interfere in the consciousness computation. How can
> you store Bruno's film in such a universe?
>
> Telmo.


But brain functions are essentially classical (see Tegmark's paper). Thought
would be impossible if quantum entanglement was more that a perturbation. From
a classical viewpoint, your brain can only be causally affected by a finite
portion of the universe.

Brent

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sat Nov 22 2008 - 15:45:55 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST