Hi Gordon,
Le 20-nov.-08, à 21:40, Gordon Tsai a écrit :
> Bruno:
> I think you and John touched the fundamental issues of human
> rational. It's a dilemma encountered by phenomenology. Now I have a
> question: In theory we can't distinguish ourselves from a Lobian
> Machine. But can lobian machines truly have sufficient rich
> experiences like human?
This is our assumption. Assuming comp, we are machine, so certainly
some machine can have our rich experiences. Indeed, us.
> For example, is it possible for a lobian machine to "still its
> mind' or "cease the computational logic" like some eastern philosophy
> suggested? Maybe any of the out-of-loop experience is still part of
> the computation/logic, just as our out-of-body experiences are
> actually the trick of brain chemicals?
Eventually we will be led to the idea that it is the "brain chemicals"
which are the result of a trick of "universal consciousness", but here
I am anticipating. Let us go carefully step by step.
I think I will have some time this afternoon to make MGA 2,
See you there ...
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Nov 21 2008 - 06:44:48 PST