Re: MGA 1

From: Bruno Marchal <marchal.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:43:57 +0100

Hi Gordon,

Le 20-nov.-08, à 21:40, Gordon Tsai a écrit :

> Bruno:
>    I think you and John touched the fundamental issues of human
> rational. It's a dilemma encountered by phenomenology. Now I have a
> question: In theory we can't distinguish ourselves from a Lobian
> Machine. But can lobian machines truly have sufficient rich
> experiences like human?

This is our assumption. Assuming comp, we are machine, so certainly
some machine can have our rich experiences. Indeed, us.



> For example, is it possible for a lobian machine to "still its
> mind' or "cease the computational logic" like some eastern philosophy
> suggested? Maybe any of the out-of-loop experience is still part of
> the computation/logic, just as our out-of-body experiences are
> actually the trick of brain chemicals?


Eventually we will be led to the idea that it is the "brain chemicals"
which are the result of a trick of "universal consciousness", but here
I am anticipating. Let us go carefully step by step.

I think I will have some time this afternoon to make MGA 2,

See you there ...

Bruno


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Nov 21 2008 - 06:44:48 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST