Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Let us go back to the point. The point of MGA is to show that MEC +
> MAT implies a contradiction. You can see that it is equivalent with
> - the proposition saying that MEC implies NON MAT (mechanism refutes
> materialism).
> - the proposition saying that MAT implies NON MECH (materialism
> refutes mechanism)
>
> Now, MECH implies " NON MAT" can be made constructive. This means MECH
> provides the complete constraints of how a physical laws looks like
> and come from, meaning physics is a branch of computationalist theory
> of mind (itself a branch of number theory, in a slightest more general
> sense of "number").
>
> Now, imagine that luckily we arrive at a proof that the "arithmetical"
> electron weights two kg. Then we will know that mechanism is false.
*But only in /our/ universe, right. In some other universe couldn't
electrons actually weigh 2kg?*
>
>
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Nov 20 2008 - 13:09:14 PST