*So you're saying that a "physics extracted from mechanism" which (let's
assume) refutes mechanism, leads inescapably to a mathematical structure
in logic-space which actually constitutes the "physical" universe. And
thus we can justify and explain the physical laws without any reference
to matter. Is that it or are their other implications?
*
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Hi m.a.
>
>
> if mechanism is true, then the "physical universe" appears to be the
> border of the universal machine "ignorance". The cosmos is the tip of
> the iceberg. And the laws of physics are really something which
> evolved, yet not in a space time, but in a logical space gluing the
> possible machine "dreams". I am not saying this is true, only that it
> is a consequence of the seemingly innocent (for some naturalist)
> mechanist hypothesis.
>
> It gives a way to justify the why and how of physical laws, and this
> from mechanism, and this without making the (ad hoc) assumption of a
> physical universe. And if you do the math, you get a physics extracted
> from mechanism, and you can use it to confirm mechanism or to refute it.
>
> You can take the reasoning train which is currently passing. Mainly
> the MGA can be understood by patient layman having some notion of
> digital machine.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ <http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/%7Emarchal/>
>
>
>
>
> >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Nov 19 2008 - 10:02:10 PST