I think the most compelling arguments against a fundamental physical reality
go along the lines of starting with one, and showing you can abstract away
from it until it becomes just another arbitrary perspective.
--------------------------
- Did you ever hear of "The Seattle Seven"?
- Mmm.
- That was me... and six other guys.
2008/11/12 Kory Heath <kory.domain.name.hidden>
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2008, at 9:31 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > The problem with Dennett is that he takes physical reality for
> > granted.
>
> I agree. But from his perspective, the burden is on us to explain why
> we can't take physical reality for granted. I've never seen the
> arguments laid out quite clearly enough for my tastes. (And I'll
> admit, I've been too lazy to try it myself.)
>
> -- Kory
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Nov 12 2008 - 08:46:03 PST