Re: Emotions

From: Kim Jones <kimjones.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:33:56 +1100

On 24/10/2008, at 4:14 PM, Brent Meeker wrote:

> I'm not sure what distinction you're making. As far as I'm concerned
> feelings=emotions.

Brent which of the following portray 'feelings' and which portray
'emotions':


I have a ( ) my uranium shares might go up soon


I have a ( ) it might rain


God exists. If you don't agree then you must be a freakin &+*&&*I


I had a ( ) that someone was trying to manipulate me


I had this ( ) that things will work out OK between us


God does not exist. If you can't reason that you must be a &^*H*$!-AT_SYMBOL-


I'm suggesting that emotions are tethered to survival need and
protection of values etc.

There is radical brain-chemistry change of state under emotions

They have a physical effect on the organism having them that can be
spotted easily by a 3rd party

Feelings are mildly intellectual sensations of value that we have that
give us a compass for general decision-making (not warefare or survival)

Not the same chemistry involved at all

Do you feel like tea or coffee, Brent?

Or would you prefer to see Sarah Palin ripped to shreds by a pack of
wolves?

cheers,

Kim




f








--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Oct 24 2008 - 01:34:13 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST