---- I think we are due for yet another extension to logic, one which will contain Bayesianism as a special case. I think Bruno had it right, it's all Category Theory- and make the next big leap forward in logic, we need to start using the concepts from Category Theory and apply them to logic, to develop a new logic capable of going beyond Bayesianism and dealing with the semantics of information. But how? Listen to this: <b>Given two categories C and D a functor F from C to D can be thought of as an *analogy* between C and D, because F has to map objects of C to objects of D and arrows of C to arrows of D in such a way that the compositional structure of the two categories is preserved.</b> And therein lies the big clue suggesting that the concepts from category theory can be used to develop a new logic of analogies. And there I shall leave you for now. See you around the galaxy :D --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---Received on Thu Sep 11 2008 - 06:33:44 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:15 PST