The “Tegmark's levels” is a pure simplification for the consumption by
laymen. There are no Multiverse levels; it is continuum of the same
concept categorized to some superficial categories. Read the comments
of “Bruno Marchal” in this thread above it illustrates it very well.
On Jul 8, 10:11 am, Brent Meeker <meeke....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> Tom Caylor wrote:
> > Ronald,
>
> > Of course the main constraints are your audience, Star Trek fans, who
> > usually like talking about frontiers of physics and even mind/body
> > problem issues etc., but also your own background (I don't know what
> > it is) prompts the audience to adjust their level of attention based
> > on whether they think you are talking about stuff that you might know
> > something about. Another idea is to key off of a source which the
> > audience is familiar with. For instance, Michio Kaku
>
> Larry Krauss
>
> >wrote The
> > Physics of Star Trek a while ago, and another book called Parallel
> > Worlds, and recently came out with a book called The Physics of the
> > Impossible which you could use as a launching platform and talk about
> > how themultiverserealm might help to think about some of the
> > impossibilities that Kaku writes about, such as teleportation.
>
> > Tom
>
> > On Jul 7, 2:14 pm, "Ronald Held" <ronaldh....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> >> I am giving a talk on theMultiverseto Star Trek fans in several
> >> weeks. I would appreciate any advice and suggestions, since as of now,
> >> I have an outline based on Tegmark's four levels.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Mon Jul 14 2008 - 01:49:37 PDT