- Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Christopher Maloney <dude.domain.name.hidden>

Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 08:14:26 -0500

Jerry Clark wrote:

*>
*

*> Such 'Life' evolution raises an interesting question: These SAS's would ...
*

*> Sooner or later a physicists would hear about
*

*> this new development and the realisation would be made that their universe
*

*> *is* a Life simulation.
*

Would it? This is a questions I've thought about some. Would the

fundamental mechanism of the life simulation be deducible by these

SAS's? Perhaps the only things that would be "knowable" by these

SAS's would be higher level structures, which they might interpret

as, for example, eleven dimensional quantum mechanical strings, or

something.

But, assuming that the lowest level structure of their world is

discernable, I would expect there to be a significant difference

between the measure of those creatures and the measure of other

creatures - us perhaps.

So if we further assume that our universe is *not* a game of life,

and if the AUH is true, then by the SSA I would conclude that the

probability of any SAS finding itself to be in a game of life is

probably zero. That is, the set of SAS's inside a game of life is

of measure zero relative to the set of SAS's inside universes like

ours.

In the bizarre nature of infinite sets, not all SAS's are in

universes like ours, but in fact the probability of being in a

universe like ours is 100%.

*>
*

*> More interestingly still: when are *we* going to discover some
*

*> CA or similar which
*

*> turns out to be *our* universe? In my lifetime I hope.
*

CA?

Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 08:14:26 -0500

Jerry Clark wrote:

Would it? This is a questions I've thought about some. Would the

fundamental mechanism of the life simulation be deducible by these

SAS's? Perhaps the only things that would be "knowable" by these

SAS's would be higher level structures, which they might interpret

as, for example, eleven dimensional quantum mechanical strings, or

something.

But, assuming that the lowest level structure of their world is

discernable, I would expect there to be a significant difference

between the measure of those creatures and the measure of other

creatures - us perhaps.

So if we further assume that our universe is *not* a game of life,

and if the AUH is true, then by the SSA I would conclude that the

probability of any SAS finding itself to be in a game of life is

probably zero. That is, the set of SAS's inside a game of life is

of measure zero relative to the set of SAS's inside universes like

ours.

In the bizarre nature of infinite sets, not all SAS's are in

universes like ours, but in fact the probability of being in a

universe like ours is 100%.

CA?

-- Chris Maloney http://www.chrismaloney.com "Donuts are so sweet and tasty." -- Homer SimpsonReceived on Mon Dec 06 1999 - 05:21:38 PST

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:06 PST
*