Re: All feedback appreciated - An introduction to Algebraic Physics

From: Zen_Ved <shevch.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 04:42:46 -0700 (PDT)

Brian Tenneson:
> Why is the universe a subset of the set "information" (which I assume is
> defined in the article) and why can it not be formalized?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Zen_Ved <shevch.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > As to "Algebraic Physics"; as well as to Wei Dai's ``everything''
> > questionnaire:
> >
> > - possibly that it will be rather useful to read
> >
> > http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0703043 , V5 (and the first couple of
> > pages in V1).
> >
> > Note also briefly: the Universe (Universes ) is/are subsets of a very
> > specific set ? of the set "Information"; and this set principally
> > can not be formalised - in any "Algebraic Physics".
_______________

***"(which I assume is defined in the article) "***

- if you have read the paper “the Information and the Matter”, PDF,
in the link http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0703043 , V5 (and the first
couple of pages in V1) -then it is possible, that it would not be
this (and others) question in your post.

The concept “information” (as well as the set “Information”) is/are
utmost common and fundamental thing(s), so it can be defined only
through itself – what isn’t correct; or – evidentially not completely
– through it’s properties.
Among the properties, e.g., there is the property of the information
that the information is unique thing which is (can be) “absolutely”
exact. At that – very small (in reality – infinitesimal if the all set
is considered) change in “Shannon” information can lead to large
change in the information. Simple example – for physics the accuracy
10^-7 is rather good accuracy, but if somebody makes a mistake on 1 in
a phone number, he can obtain any result outside desired.

That's only one property that practically exclude the possibility of
formalization of the concept/set Information - it is too bufircative.
Besides – it is ultimately infinite to be formalised by using any
finite language; etc...

So – it would be better to read the paper-?

Cheers

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Jul 03 2008 - 07:43:05 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST