Re: Cosmology and Boltzmann brains

From: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:13:16 -0700

Russell Standish wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 09:24:21PM -0700, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
>>> scientific theories (doing so by definition). The reason it is
>>> rejected is because of the arbitrary nature of the date makes it a
>>> more complex theory (in the Occam's razor sense).
>>>
>> And it is not POVI.
>>
>> Brent Meeker
>>
>>
>
> True, but then POVI is a specialised version of Occams razor.
>
>
It is more specific and as Vic argues it is sine qua non for a
scientific theory. Occams razor is a vague desiderata. You can justify
almost anything by choosing your definition of "complex", e.g. theists
say, "God did it." is the simplest possible theory.

Brent

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Jun 18 2008 - 14:13:28 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST