Hi Brian,
Le 13-mai-08, à 02:00, Brian Tenneson a écrit :
>
> [...]
> To recapitulate, the statement of the idea is this:
> [1]
> Randomness implies consciousness.
I don't see why, or even what this could mean.
> The converse appears to be false.
Comp (+ Consciousness or just first person perspective) implies (first
person) randomness (Cf step 3 of the UDA).
>
> [2]
> SAS implies consciousness.
OK (but trivial, imo)
> The converse appears to be false. <consider a one-second-old frog,
> for example>
I think you're a bit unfair with the old frogs ...
Best,
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue May 13 2008 - 10:37:47 PDT