I find that words and their meaning can have magical properties, despite
this discussion not seeming to me to have bearing on my article; perhaps a
new thread on semantics can be started? It matters not to me.
For example, if I say all that is is all that is, then I am not really
saying much. On the other hand, if I say that all that is is the universe
generated by a universal set then at least that has some content as
evaluatable as true, false, neither, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth
value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's
prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value,
or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior
to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or
neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to
this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither
of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of what's prior to this
truth value, or neither of what's prior to this truth value, or neither of
what's prior to this truth value, or well, you probably get the idea.
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Marchal Bruno <marchal.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
> JamesTauber wrote:
>
> >1) the problem is theirs not ours
> >vs
> >2) it is their problem not our problem
>
>
> So, if I understand well, our problems are ours, and their problems are
> theirs. Thanks for the teaching: I didn't dare to put a "s" on "their", up
> to now, especially after a plural (but only contingently so if I can say).
>
> Semantically, I'm afraid theirs problems can be ours too, and our problems
> can be theirs too, by the Shit Spreading Principle ... or by the unicity of
> the first person ...
>
> Am I grammactically correct?
> Am I semantically correct?
> Am I politically correct?
> Am I self-referentially correct?
> :)?
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >James
> >(who happened to do his undergrad linguistics degree where Russell did
> >his undergrad physics/maths)
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ <http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/%7Emarchal/>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Mon May 12 2008 - 15:36:32 PDT