Re: All feedback appreciated - An introduction to Algebraic Physics

From: GŁnther Greindl <>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 18:06:17 +0200

Dear Bruno,

> I have already presented an argument (an easy consequence of the
> Universal Dovetailer Argument, which is less easy probably) showing that:
> - CRH implies COMP
> - COMP implies the negation of CRH
> - Thus, with or without COMP (and with or without the MUH) the CRH does
> not hold.


COMP implies the negation of CRH

Is this also in your Sane 2004 paper? (then I missed that point) - if
not, where did you argue this?


GŁnther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Thu May 01 2008 - 12:07:15 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST