Re: All feedback appreciated - An introduction to Algebraic Physics

From: GŁnther Greindl <guenther.greindl.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 18:06:17 +0200

Dear Bruno,

> I have already presented an argument (an easy consequence of the
> Universal Dovetailer Argument, which is less easy probably) showing that:
>
> - CRH implies COMP
> - COMP implies the negation of CRH
> - Thus, with or without COMP (and with or without the MUH) the CRH does
> not hold.



Regarding:

COMP implies the negation of CRH

Is this also in your Sane 2004 paper? (then I missed that point) - if
not, where did you argue this?

Cheers,
GŁnther

-- 
GŁnther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
guenther.greindl.domain.name.hidden
http://www.univie.ac.at/Wissenschaftstheorie/
Blog: http://dao.complexitystudies.org/
Site: http://www.complexitystudies.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu May 01 2008 - 12:07:15 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST