On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Fritz Griffith wrote:
> awareness of each other one. The fact that probability does not exist in
> this interpretation implies that it does not matter how many more lawless
> worlds there are than lawful ones; along with the lawless worlds, you will
> still necessarily experience the lawful one, and within that world (and
> every other one) it will feel like that is the only world, due to the
> condition of lack of awareness of the other parts of the whole concience.
> In a nutshell, that is why our universe is lawful according to the CCI.
One could still ask for the effective probability of a
sub-observation. For example if I had 100 eyes, I could ask for the
effective probability of an eye seeing red.
Your above argument does not make any sense. Yes, part of us
would see a lawful world; in your view, we would also see many more
non-lawful worlds. Nothing is gained by declaring these views 'connected'
and avoiding the question of why we see a lawful one.
- - - - - - -
Jacques Mallah (jqm1584.domain.name.hidden)
Graduate Student / Many Worlder / Devil's Advocate
"I know what no one else knows" - 'Runaway Train', Soul Asylum
My URL:
http://pages.nyu.edu/~jqm1584/
Received on Tue Nov 30 1999 - 13:31:40 PST