Hi Russell:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 09:35:47PM -0500, Hal Ruhl wrote:
>>
>> Hi Russell:
>>
>> In response to Jason you wrote:
>>
>>>An OM is a state of a machine. In as far as the machine is embedded
>>>in space, the the OM is spread across space. Successive OMs involve
>>>state change,
>
>>In my model a universe is an incomplete entity [a Something or a Nothing]
>>within the Everything [the ALL(s) + the Nothing(s)[nesting provides the
>>multiplicity]] that is driven towards completeness by un-resolvable
>>meaningful [to that entities current state] questions that require
>>resolution. I suppose this constitutes a "machine".
>
>>I wonder if these conclusions - [machines/dynamics] - indeed impose the
>>property of having space like aspects on the Everything in addition to
time
>>like aspects? Further - would that in turn give it a wider "physical"
>>matrix?
>
>Its not obvious to me. What is your reasoning?
As I understand your Theory of Nothing book the "Everything" in it has or at
least contains time like components [time postulate]. I agree but
apparently for a different reason.
In your reply to Jason you allowed that the OM "machine" [our "machines"
also apparently differ] could have an extent in space as well. This seems
to require the Everything to have space like aspects. Actually if it
contains one dimension in a real sense to avoid selection it should contain
more. If it has time and space aspects what prevents it from having
material aspects? Until now I had felt that the Everything did not require
space or material aspects but I am reconsidering the possibility.
>
>>>Of course this finite amount of time will be
>>>observer dependent,
>
>>How do you mean that. I do not see that state dwell duration differs
within
>>a given universe. I also do not see a fixed value even for a particular
>>universe.
>Sounds like you're having a bob each way here...
As I understand your response to Jason you allow two different observers [a
fly and a human] in the same universe to have different OM durations and I
do not see this. Perhaps I do not understand your response. Did you intend
to have them in the same universe?
Yours
Hal Ruhl
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Mathematics
UNSW SYDNEY 2052 hpcoder.domain.name.hidden
Australia http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Mon Mar 31 2008 - 22:30:12 PDT