George and Hal:
Why does a "question" emerge? Why does it 'imply' to be answered? (I
avoid 'why do we feel') Where did 'incompleteness' occur from?
All these are very 'human' concepts and we impersonate them into a wider sense.
"WE" (as Bruno asked: who is that? and I replied 'humanly thinking
machines') still 'think' in our restricted human terms - cannot do
otherwise - using that incomplete primitive tool (brain function)
which in Self-reflection (consciousness? I hate that term) realizes
its own incompleteness and projects it towards the targets of its
thinking.
So the question itself does not 'emerge': it 'imerges in our thinking.
"Something" stands for the unidentified content - a challenge (human that is).
And - George - yes, the English language IS broken (as are all other
ones, maybe the English - as a mixed artifact - a bit more) because it
stands for unclear symbols and their communication with the pretension
of clarity. Words are restrictive tools of a restrictive
brainfunction.
Sorry for the holiday-breaking denigration
John
On Jan 19, 2008 8:13 PM, George Levy <glevy.domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
> Hal
>
> Ok, there is no feeling but there is motivation. There is no feeling of
> motivation and there is motivation without feeling. This is totally alien or
> the English language is broken.
>
>
>
> George
>
> Hal Ruhl wrote:
> Hi George:
>
> I see no "feeling" of anything in a Something. There is only an absence
> of the information needed to answer meaningful questions that are asked and
> must is be answered.
>
> Hal Ruhl
>
> At 11:13 PM 1/17/2008, you wrote:
>
> Hal,
> Allright. You are saying that incompleteness is the (only) motivator of the
> members. In other words the members feel motivated by incompleteness. They
> do have the feeling of being incomplete that motivates their behavior. Is
> this correct?
> George
>
> Hal Ruhl wrote:
>
>
> Hi George:
>
> I see no motivator to any dynamics within the Everything other than
> the incompleteness of some of its members and the unavoidable
> necessity to progressively resolve this incompleteness.
>
> Hal Ruhl
>
> At 12:29 AM 1/17/2008, you wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hal Ruhl wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> This is an automatic process like a mass has to answer to the
> forces
> [meaningful questions] applied to it.
>
>
>
> What in the psyche of the mass makes it answer to the forces?
>
> George
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Sun Jan 20 2008 - 07:49:17 PST