Hi George:
I see no "feeling" of anything in a Something. There is only an
absence of the information needed to answer meaningful questions that
are asked and must is be answered.
Hal Ruhl
At 11:13 PM 1/17/2008, you wrote:
>Hal,
>Allright. You are saying that incompleteness is the (only) motivator
>of the members. In other words the members feel motivated by
>incompleteness. They do have the feeling of being incomplete that
>motivates their behavior. Is this correct?
>George
>
>Hal Ruhl wrote:
>>
>>Hi George:
>>
>>I see no motivator to any dynamics within the Everything other than
>>the incompleteness of some of its members and the unavoidable
>>necessity to progressively resolve this incompleteness.
>>
>>Hal Ruhl
>>
>>At 12:29 AM 1/17/2008, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>Hal Ruhl wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>This is an automatic process like a mass has to answer to the forces
>>>>[meaningful questions] applied to it.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>What in the psyche of the mass makes it answer to the forces?
>>>
>>>George
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Jan 18 2008 - 21:34:08 PST