Re: Cantor's Diagonal

From: GŁnther Greindl <>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:30:33 +0100


> Because zero even repeated an infinity of time is zero and is a natural
> number. (1,1,1,...) can't be a natural number because it is not finite and a
> natural number is finite. If it was a natural number, then N would not have a
> total ordering.

Ok agreed: I was caught up in viewing it simply as an "indexing" scheme,
but viewed constructively I of course agree. My error.

>> I am becoming more and more an ultra-finitist. Arguments with infinity
>> seem to be very based on the assumptions you make (about platonia or
>> whatever)
> Finite and infinite concepts are dual concepts you can't leave one without
> leaving the other.

Could you elaborate some more on this?


GŁnther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
University of Vienna
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Fri Dec 21 2007 - 07:33:57 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST