Re: Bijections (was OM = SIGMA1)

From: meekerdb <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:41:21 -0800

Bruno Marchal wrote:
> ...
> If not, let us just say that your ultrafinitist hypothesis is too
> strong to make it coherent with the computationalist hypo. It means
> that you have a theory which is just different from what I propose.
> And then I will ask you to be "ultra-patient", for I prefer to
> continue my explanation, and to come back on the discussion on
> hypotheses after. OK.
>
> Actually, my conversation with Tom was interrupted by Norman who fears
> people leaving the list when matter get too much technical;
Pay no attention to Norman. :-)

I attend to this list because I learn things from it and I learn a lot
from your technical presentations. I'm also doubtful of infinities, but
they make things simpler; so my attitude is, let's see where the theory
takes us.

Brent Meeker


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Nov 16 2007 - 12:41:38 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST