On 12 Sep, 01:50, Youness Ayaita <younes....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> No(-)Justification Justifies The Everything Ensemble
> The amazing result of these simple considerations is that we get the
> Everything ensemble gratis! We don't need any postulate. But how is
> this transition made? At this point I remind you of the second section
> of this article: The Everything ensemble, or the statement that
> everything exists, is the interpretation of our new perspective in the
> everyday theory. In our everyday theory, we use the concept of
> 'existence' as a property of things. A property p is given by the
> ensemble of (imaginable) things that have that property. Thus we can
> identify the property p with the ensemble of (imaginable) things
> having that property.
That isn't how properties are defined, and existence isn't a (first
order) property.
We place things into ensembles (classes, as opposed to sets) on the
basis of their properties;
we don't read properties off from ensembles. Properties have to come
first, or we would not
be able to classify individuals that we had not encountered before.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Thu Sep 13 2007 - 07:26:40 PDT