Re: Penrose and algorithms

From: LauLuna <laureanoluna.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:02:38 -0700

As I see it, compatibilism changes the definition of free will from a
metaphysical to a psychological one. So, I am probably a compatibilist
according to the compatibilist definition of free will, which is not
my own.

Regards

On Jul 6, 2:00 pm, Jason <jasonre....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2:14 pm, LauLuna <laureanol....domain.name.hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I don't see how to reconcile free will with computationalism either.
>
> It seems like you are an incompatibilist concerning free will.
> Freewill can be reconciled with computationalism (or any deterministic
> system) if one accepts compatabilism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will#Compatibilism
> ). More worrisome than determinism's affect on freewill, however, is
> many-worlds (or other everything/ultimate ensemble theories). Whereas
> determinism says the future is written in stone, many-worlds would say
> all futures are written in stone.
>
> Jason


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Fri Jul 06 2007 - 09:02:54 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:14 PST