Re: Evidence for the simulation argument

From: Brent Meeker <meekerdb.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:41:52 -0800

Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Le 20-mars-07, à 18:05, Brent Meeker a écrit :
>
>> What are those relations? Is it a matter of the provenance of the
>> numbers, e.g. being computed by some subprocess of the UD? Or is an
>> inherent relation like being relatively prime?
>
>
> It is an inherent relation like being prime, or being the godel number
> of a proof of f, etc.

I didn't think godel numbering was unique? If I just cite a number, like 12345678987654321, is it either the godel number of a proof or not?

Brent

>
> Bruno
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
> >
>
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Mar 21 2007 - 12:51:33 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST