Re: Evidence for the simulation argument

From: Mark Peaty <mpeaty.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 02:18:53 +0900

Tangentially:

Brent: 'doesn't mean Sherlock Holmes exists in some Platonic
realm ...'

MP: For those who occasionally like a clever and entertaining
read unencumbered by deep social comment can I recommend the
adventures of Ms Thursday Next in 'The Eyre Affair' a novel by
Jasper FForde, and in the sequels, the names of which I have
forgotten at the moment. The author shows what could happen if
Platonia started really getting out of hand.




Regards

Mark Peaty CDES

mpeaty.domain.name.hidden

http://www.arach.net.au/~mpeaty/





Brent Meeker wrote:
> Mohsen Ravanbakhsh wrote:
>> /All actual measurements yield rational values. Using real
>> numbers in the equations of physics is probably merely a
>> convenience (since calculus is easier than finite
>> differences). There is no evidence that defining an
>> instantaneous state requires uncountable information. /
>>
>> What about the realizability of mathematical concepts. Real
>> numbers are mathematical, so they should have a
>> counterpart in real world.
>
> Why? "Mathematical" means nothing but not
> self-contradictory. Sherlock Holmes stories are
> mathematical. That doesn't mean Sherlock Holmes exists in
> some Platonic realm.
>
> Brent Meeker
>
> >
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Mar 13 2007 - 13:20:25 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST