Re: Evidence for the simulation argument

From: Stathis Papaioannou <stathisp.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:19:14 +1100

On 3/13/07, Mohsen Ravanbakhsh <ravanbakhsh.domain.name.hidden> wrote:

*Why? "Mathematical" means nothing but not self-contradictory. Sherlock
> Holmes stories are mathematical. That doesn't mean Sherlock Holmes exists
> in some Platonic realm.
> *
>
> Brent,
>
> What do you mean by that? I do not get your point.
> Anyway I do not insist that it should be realizable. But I have examples
> in which we need them!
> Consider the use of Pythagoras theorem in nature. There are many cases in
> which the distance between two points should be irrational.
>

Not necessarily. If you draw a diagonal on a square on a computer screen, it
will be made up of a discrete number of pixels despite what Pythagoras'
theorem calculates. Irrational in the real world may just be an illusion.

Stathis Papaioannou

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Tue Mar 13 2007 - 05:19:37 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST