Re: Evidence for the simulation argument

From: Stathis Papaioannou <>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 20:19:14 +1100

On 3/13/07, Mohsen Ravanbakhsh <> wrote:

*Why? "Mathematical" means nothing but not self-contradictory. Sherlock
> Holmes stories are mathematical. That doesn't mean Sherlock Holmes exists
> in some Platonic realm.
> *
> Brent,
> What do you mean by that? I do not get your point.
> Anyway I do not insist that it should be realizable. But I have examples
> in which we need them!
> Consider the use of Pythagoras theorem in nature. There are many cases in
> which the distance between two points should be irrational.

Not necessarily. If you draw a diagonal on a square on a computer screen, it
will be made up of a discrete number of pixels despite what Pythagoras'
theorem calculates. Irrational in the real world may just be an illusion.

Stathis Papaioannou

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
Received on Tue Mar 13 2007 - 05:19:37 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Feb 16 2018 - 13:20:13 PST