Re: God and the plenitude (was:The Meaning of Life)

From: Russell Standish <lists.domain.name.hidden>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 07:43:27 +1100

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:54:44PM -0800, Tom Caylor wrote:
> Why wouldn't the *whole* of such a Plenitude be truly superfluous to
> any reality? According to Bruno's recursion theory argument, most of
> the stuff in the Plenitude is useless junk. *Someone* (somebody
> bigger that you or I ;) has to decide what is the good stuff. The
> good stuff IN *all* of the Plenitude, not just part of it. This is
> what I mean by being in charge of it.
>
> Tom
>

I don't see anyone else deciding what the good stuff is except for you
and I and every other observer (or person if you desire) out there
deciding for themselves. This is anthropic selection. There doesn't
seem to be anyone else out there deciding what is good for me.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Mathematics                         	 
UNSW SYDNEY 2052         	         hpcoder.domain.name.hidden
Australia                                http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Received on Wed Mar 07 2007 - 02:11:30 PST