Tom Caylor writes:
>I'm talking about ultimate meaning, meaning which is ultimately based
> >on truth. Purpose would go along with that. I think that this
> >situation is similar (metaphysically isomorphic? :) to the "primary
> >matter" situation. I think you maintain that experience is enough. I
> >maintain that if all you have is relative references, you are having
> >faith that there is ultimately something "there". I'm not interested
> >in any straw-man caricature god who decides what is valuable etc. on a
> >whim. I'm interested in the source of the wonderfully unexplainable
> >good in us.
>
If you built a model society and set its citizens instincts, goals,
laws-from-heaven (but really from you) and so on, would that suffice to
provide "meaning"?
Stathis Papaioannou
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list.domain.name.hidden
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list-unsubscribe.domain.name.hidden
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Received on Wed Feb 14 2007 - 02:47:47 PST